Perhaps a few examples regarding some typical canned upline
responses might help here PW?
--- In mlmsurvivorsclub@
<paine_wwweb_
>
> > Another point would be to ask them
> > questions you know their upline has
> > answered and after they respond, point
> > out the difference between their canned
> > responses and an actual answer.
>
>
> To expand upon this point a little bit:
>
> A great way to frame a response in such a conversation would be to
> restate what the canned, upline response was. In other words, you
can
> say, "Let me see if I understand what you're saying. Your answer
was
> {fill in the blank}, but this is what I thought it was. Can you
> explain the difference? Can you tell me how the answer you got
> (presumably from your upline) contradicts my research and how my
> conclusions about it don't make sense?"
>
> Obviously, you'll want to word that to apply in your situation.
But
> what this does is force the comparison between reality and what is
> being taught. It doesn't dictate what is right or wrong. In
fact, it
> suggests that you don't have a full understanding of the situation
and
> that you're looking to comprehend how one story differs from the
other.
>
> The idea, as Hal pointed out, is not to be confrontational but to
give
> the IBO/MLM rep an opportunity to compare their teachings with what
> happens in the real world. When enough of the teaching breaks with
> reality, most people will begin to doubt what they're being
taught.
> That line may be different for everyone, but I think everyone has
such
> a line.
>
>
> PW
>
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment