Thursday, January 17, 2008

[MLM Survivors Club] Re: Fanista

I found a NYT article on this.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/20/business/media/20amway.html?pagewanted=1

From the article, its not clear if this is the MLM model. If I
understand correctly,
1. There is no sign up fee, and you are not required to buy anything
monthly (?) - not sure about this.
2. You get commissions on every purchase your referral makes (?)

Not that I would EVER touch anything remotely connected with Amway!!

--- In mlmsurvivorsclub@yahoogroups.com, Hal Vaughan <hal@...> wrote:
>
> On Thursday 17 January 2008, John Linthicum wrote:
> > On Jan 17, 2008, at 11:09 AM, annjan1948 wrote:
> > > I'd heard that Amway was starting up an online music business.
> > > I've just come across their site. You have to hunt for the MLM
> > > angle, but I found it . Here's an edited version.
> > >
> > > "We started FANISTA with the simple notion that, in a world of so
> > > [kersnikt]
> > >
> > > what we all seem to do so naturally: championing the entertainment
> > > we love the most, and telling people why."
> > >
> > > Sounds harmless, doesn't it?
> >
> > And once again, they're late to the party. Sounds like every other
> > online affiliate program out there, trying to get their "nose under
> > the iTunes tent." Until the AMO's start putting *their* "Life
> > Coaching" content to be distributed in this manner, setting up a paid
> > subscription model, with "convenient auto-pay" feature, hitting your
> > CC on a regular basis, and no charge backs after agreeing to a
> > binding purchase "arbitration" agreement, whether you're ever
> > "entertained" or not.
> >
> > SSDP. (Same S* Different Product).
>
> They don't know what they're doing.
>
> I first tried it on my regular browser, Firefox on Linux. It froze it
> up. So I tried it on Internet Explorer, the browser that is so
> insecure that the Department of Homeland Security says should not be
> used at all (and I'm not kidding -- they say do NOT use IE at ALL!).
> It came up, but much of the site wasn't visible. It also said I should
> use a later version of IE or Firefox, so I ran Firefox on Windows XP.
> Most of the site was again not visible (a lot of images didn't load),
> so I hit refresh and the browser freezes. I finally get it to load in
> Firefox.
>
> It looks like they're selling CDs, not downloads. That makes sense,
> because they'd need a different deal with the record companies to sell
> downloads and right now those are limited. I think some of the Big 4
> labels are only selling downloads through exclusive deals. While I
> only buy CDs and don't buy downloads (which are often crippled because
> they limit when and where they can be played), the vast majority of
> online sales are for downloads. I *SERIOUSLY* doubt much of the online
> market will even care about a new CD site without downloads.
>
> It's also important to remember if this is AW, that there's a
difference
> between AW (however spineless it's become) and the AMOs.
>
> Hal
>

__._,_.___
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Need traffic?

Drive customers

With search ads

on Yahoo!

Biz Resources

Y! Small Business

Articles, tools,

forms, and more.

Improvement Zone

on Yahoo! Groups

Find groups about

New Year's goals.

.

__,_._,___

No comments: