Tuesday, January 29, 2008

[MLM Survivors Club] Re: Just flat out too expensive?

Basically, cell phone service has to be $40 a month, or maybe $60 a
month for premium service, and that price may go lower, as much as
companies have tried to product-differentiate, and as much as they
have tried to use tricky pricing plans. It is basically just a
commodity service.

And yeah, 1% sounds way too low for a commission sales person.

-Doug

PS An older sales person told me, 'I've learned to be very skeptical
of outfits that really emphasize positive thinking.'

--- In mlmsurvivorsclub@yahoogroups.com, "x3of5x" <x3of5x@...> wrote:
>
> Afraid not. No matter what the product is, the network marketing
model
> is inherently flawed, because of the geometric growth of
distributors.
> As far as selling the products for profit yourself...well, you can
> certainly try that, but that's not network marketing. Also, no
network
> marketing tel-com company that I know of gives you a good enough
> return on your efforts to make it worth while.
>
> In ACN, the company I was in, the average rep could expect to see 1%
> of his own customer's bills. And unless he built a huge
organization,
> or signed up many, many customers, that would be all he would ever
see.
>
> -Eric
>
>
>
>
> --- In mlmsurvivorsclub@yahoogroups.com, "vermontredfox"
> <vermontredfox@> wrote:
> >
> > Isn't that the deal with Amway? Yeah, the products are kind of
> > alright, but they're so expensive! Super premium prices for what
are
> > merely premium products.
> >
> > So, something like phone service which might work as part of
network
> > marketing because you're not transporting product, the price is
just
> > too high, especially for something that is basically just a
comodity
> > service.
> >
> > -Doug
> >
>

__._,_.___
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Drive Traffic

Sponsored Search

can help increase

your site traffic.

New business?

Get new customers.

List your web site

in Yahoo! Search.

Find helpful tips

for Moderators

on the Yahoo!

Groups team blog.

.

__,_._,___

No comments: