This whole Charles King angle comes from at least one "training
source" - that I know of - There is a total Huckster(will remain
unnamed) that sells generic MLM training that includes an interview
with Charles King - I have seen it(and almost got sick :)) - The
question for Roland really is why aren't Harvard Business, Stanford,
Kellogg and Wharton NOT teaching MLM courses ?
Also, if its so great, what MLM(s) is "Prof." King making millions from ?
--- In mlmsurvivorsclub@
>
> On Tuesday 12 February 2008, steve.indepass wrote:
> > The main reference to Professor King I found on a typical MLM
> > distributor blog -
> > http://blog.
> >
> > clicking the link http://www.uic.
> > (to the famous 'network marketing seminar') leads to a sorry-looking
> > dead page on UIC website. One which states:
> >
> > 'Pages that begin http://www.uic.
> > removed when the person leaves...'
> >
> > I've heard the 'it's taught in major Universities around the world'
> > lie many times. Its one of those infuriating untruths that people
> > use in the moment that nobody ever checks and consequently form the
> > basis of 'reality' for a lot of people.
>
> Technically it's possible it is taught in major universities, but
not in
> the way the MLMers want it to be taught. It's quite possible that MLM
> is taught as a sample of non-functioning marketing structures.
>
> I remember that was one point made in one management text I checked
on.
> MLMers claim, "This type of network marketing is taught in this book on
> page xxx." If you can check, you find it's taught -- as an example of
> what NOT to do.
>
> As you say, nobody checks on it so nobody knows what's really said.
>
> Hal
>
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment