So I have been snooping around forums (scam.com), to research World
Ventures. I find the approach/debating skills of pro MLM'rs to be
really weak. I notice that us anti MLM'rs state facts, and give
concrete evidence, and ask questions, and voice concerns, and never
attack the person in the MLM, (except for those anti MLM
knuckleheads with no tact, that like to start shit and call people
stupid for being in an MLM). And all the pro MLM'rs like to say is
that WE are NEGATIVE PEOPLE, or lazy asses with jobs, or not
ambitious. I haven't seen one pro MLMr answer the questions being
asked. Is this normal? It seems like no matter what MLM they are
in, you get the same response, attacking the person, and not
answering the questions. Maybe I am being biased, but it is obvious
that when there is a debate between MLM'rs and anti, the anti does
not need to attack the person and state flaws in their opponents
character, but the pro mlmr does. It is really lame. It is so
obvious even in writing, how dumbfounded they are by the question
(and the answer they "discovered"
tangents and say things like "you are an idiot, you don't know what
you are talking about, have you been in the business?" etc, etc.
You guys know the deal right?
Just wanted to tell you guys what I noticed (and have been irritated
about), you all probably know this already. Haha. I mean, I am not
a very good speaker, or debater, but I know that I will not win an
argument by name calling or character assasination. "Well you are
just a negative person, I don't have time to debate this with you."
I don't know whether to feel sorry for them, or laugh.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment