I doubt if any site that is critical of MLM will be taken seriously by
a current MLMer. They are TAUGHT to dismiss "negativity,
define "negative" as anything that runs contrary to the teaching of
the orgainzation.
So if I was a leader in an MLM scam, I'd tell my downline that Bo
Short was a disgruntled former-IBO whose advice should be ignored.
Scott Larsen is, of course (according to AmQuix kingpins), a whackjob
who obviously has some sort of ax to grind.
When my wife and I first got involved in the business, we didn't have
Internet access, but one of our close friends did. He printed out
pages and pages of information that should have gotten us to
reconsider being involved. It didn't work, and it took us five years
to get wise. We had to discover it for ourselves.
My advice to you, if you want to speed the process along, is to avoid
anything that smacks of lecturing but offer anything that expedites
that process of discovery. I believe that questions work better than
statements in that regard. And keep reading about MLMs so that you
are better-equipped to respond to whatever they say to you.
Remember, if the information comes from YOU (or something YOU
provide), it can be dismissed as false. If THEY discover it for
themselves, they cannot dismiss it so easily.
Good Luck to you.
PW
> I'm wondering if I should send her a link to
> Bo Short's web site to further push my point
> across... or maybe Scott Larsen's would be a
> little better; at least he describes a way in
> which "Amway can Work". If my cousin decides
> to stay in her MLM, she's going to need those
> pointers... though I can't imagine anybody
> wanting to after reading even half of what's
> on the net.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment