Tuesday, May 29, 2007

[MLM Survivors Club] Re: Ever tried Bio Lean II? Leave an Amazon.com Review!

Hal, You & I have been on the same page in many instances.
Dawn/Terra's posts have frustrated me and I was right there posting
with you until I gave up posting to her. I think she is far too pro-
MLM and shoots down anything that tells otherwise. I also thought
cstargio's post was FAR TOO HARSH. He didn't even make sense in his
attack on you. I thought "huh, is he for real?"

I think I have agreed with you before and mentioned often that you
have a great way of putting things in simple English that shows you
know what you are talking about and how to communicate. Don't worry
about those who are too thick-headed to see the nose in front of
their face.

I can look at both sides of an issue, but when I fully understand
something, I WILL pick a side. And as for the Pro-MLM people...
they can go peddle their crap (products and opinions) somewhere else.

As for the unrational posts from cstargio - he should have calmed
down first and thought about his words before responding. He was
out of line.
--- In mlmsurvivorsclub@yahoogroups.com, Hal Vaughan <hal@...> wrote:
>
> I've spent the past week and a half standing up against
> Dawn/Terra and that leading to her running out of any clear
arguments
> and using personal attacks on my reasoning (such as using it
against me
> that I figured out in a week to get out of Quackstar while it took
her
> 16 years or that I don't have children so, supposedly, her
arguments
> are more valid than mine). I'm fed up. Everyone has their limits
and
> this is mine. For once, I just had to vent.
>
> And to cstargio:
>
> You owe me an apology.
>
> I've never asked for one or said one was due. I'm not going to
argue,
> I'm not going to mollycoddle you. I'm just going to say, for the
last
> time, if you can say:
>
> > Isn't it healthy to see both sides
> > and, as a logically thinking adult, use what fits your own
personal
> > values?
>
> then you understand logic and you should understand the difference
> between logical and emotional reasoning. Your attack on me was
> emotional. That shows you've got issues on that topic, which is
fine,
> but taking them out on me is not fine. Deal with it because I'm
not
> going to.
>
> Hal
>

__._,_.___
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
SPONSORED LINKS
Search Ads

Get new customers.

List your web site

in Yahoo! Search.

Business News

Hot Headlines

Get localized news

for your area.

Yahoo! Groups

Take a Survey

express your ideas

share your opinion

.

__,_._,___

No comments: