Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Re: [MLM Survivors Club] Ad Hominem

--- In mlmsurvivorsclub@yahoogroups.com, Hal Vaughan <hal@...> wrote:
>
> On Thursday 31 May 2007, momluvseliana wrote:
> > In my first year of college in 2000, I took a critical/logical
> > thinking writing course. I don't remember much of it because
writing
> > and language arts are not my best subjects. But I remember that I
> > found it interesting because of all the different types of
arguments
> > there were. I remember the terms ad hominem, circular arguments,
> > slippery slope, etc. I remember the instrutor saying that
> > politicians use these arguments all the time. (I am not really
into
> > politics, but upon analysis of some debates, I found it cool to
spot
> > those kind of arguments.)
>
> I've seen schools teach them in high school, but it's rare. That's
too
> bad. I'm sure that class has benefited you many times over. One
time
> info like that is a big help is every election time. I think if we
had
> a truly educated population the politicians would not get away with
a
> lot of what they do. During the upcoming election, watch to see
just
> how much of all the campaigns are based on fear ("If that person is
> elected, all these terrible things will happen and the country will
> fall apart.")
>
> > I have found it extremely interesting that MLM supporters use
these
> > logical fallacies. (Is that the right term?)
>
> Exactly right.
>
> > For example how Dawn
> > tries to attack Hal by asking if he has kids, etc, etc. in a way
> > attacking his character, and avoiding the argument at hand.
>
> Oh, yes! I'm so glad others are seeing it. While experience can
count
> for a lot, it doesn't change facts. Also, as you noticed, a lot of
> that was misdirection. Perhaps she'd make a good stage magician?
To
> me, when someone starts to pull something like that, it's a clear
> indication to me that they could NOT counter an argument and had to
> change the topic or do anything to avoid replying because they were
not
> ready to admit they could not counter the point under discussion.
To
> me, when Dawn/Terra started doing that, it was clear proof she did
not
> want to acknowledge my points because they were solid and
irrefutable.
>
> > It is
> > funny to me because after being aducated by Hal about ad hominem i
> > realized that my cousin did the same thing to me. If you don't
mind
> > I am cutting and pasting her last email to me. I am willing to be
> > that anyone would find the tone harsh and emotional. Note:
> > Honestly, the only thing I said that may have pushed her buttons
was
> > that she should research MLM's and that I could find the main
> > ingredient for cheaper.
>
> And that is likely to have pushed her buttons. Why? Remember, a
lot of
> reactions like that are below the conscious level. There is a
level of
> reasoning that many people don't see. In your case, when you said
> that, you attacked two major points of her MLM: 1) That there were
> cheaper products or cheaper ways to get them, and 2) that it should
be
> researched. She knows that, at a deeper level, but they've
brainwashed
> her to believe that they have the best products at the cheapest
price
> and that they are so wonderful that anyone who dares speak against
them
> is just bitter. Anyone daring to suggest research is saying
they're
> not the cat's meow. At some level your cousin knows this but
doesn't
> want to believe it, that's why your comment pushed her buttons and
set
> her off.
>
> > I did not say her particular MLM was a
> > fraud, because honestly I don't know much about MLM's at the
time. I
> > just read the wikepedia definition for MLM and thought she should
> > check it out. This is her last word.
> >
> > FIRST OF ALL I DONT EVEN KNOW WHY WE ARE STILL TALKING ABOUT
THIS...
>
> All caps. Does she "shout" on purpose? (All caps in Internet
speak is
> considered quite rude!)

Yes, the whole letter was in caps and the first 3 paragraphs were in
RED!

>
> > WHETHER YOU DIDNT INTEND TO...YOU DID. WE WOULD NEVER REACT THIS
WAY
> > IF WE DIDNT FEEL THAT. MAYBE YOU JUST DONT REALIZE THAT COMING
FROM
> > YOUR END. IF WE WERE NOT IN THE BUSINESS YET THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN
> > BETTER BUT WE ALREADY ARE. ITS LIKE DO YOU THINK WE ARE STUPID
ENOUGH
> > TO JOIN THIS?
>
> Did she respond to your email immediately? This paragraph sounds
like
> an emotional rant with no editing and while she was still angry. I
> couldn't even follow what she said. Yes, you certainly did punch
her
> buttons!
>
> >
> > MY DAD WHO OWNS SEVERAL BUSINESSES LOOKED THIS UP BECAUSE I SHARE
> > EVERYTHING WITH HIM AND HE NEVER TOLD US IT MAY BE A
SCAM..WHY?...CUZ
> > HE KNOWS IM NOT STUPID ENOUGH TO DO IT IF IT WAS! AND HE SAID
HIMSELF
> > MULTILEVEL BUSINESS IS GOOD. HOW WILL A BUSINESS GROW IF THERE
ARE NO
> > DITRIBUTORS TO JOIN...
>
> Interesting. Yes, she is "not stupid enough" to do it if she
*knows* it
> is a scam. On the other hand, it doesn't occur to her she may be
the
> one being scammed, does it?
>
> As for distributors, that is one major thing I'm avoiding. I don't
want
> distributors for my business. They have this nasty habit of
expecting
> to get paid.
>
> > ITS JUST LIKE A TREE..JERED WENT TO MEETING
> > LAST NIGHT FOR MORTGAGE INVESTMENT AND STOCKS...SAME WAY OF
> > BUSINESS...MULTI LEVEL....THIS GUY WHO JOINED ZIJA WHEN IT FIRST
CAME
> > OUT HAS 500 PEOPLE HE INTRODUCED THIS TO AND SO HE GETS ACOMMISION
> > FROM ALL THOSE PEOPLE...ITS A GOOD TIME TO JOIN BECAUSE WE ARE ON
THE
> > TOP LEVEL ALREADY....MANY YEARS LATER THERE WILL BE ALOT OF
PEOPLE IN
> > THIS LIKE A TREE....THIS BUSINESS IS IN NO WAY A WAY TO MAKE
> > MONEY....ITS NOT ALOT....ITS JUST ON THE SIDE AND WHY NOT WITH A
> > GREAT PRODUCT LIKE THIS...IF MONEY IS THE GOAL TO BE IN
> > ZIJA....PEOPLE BETTER NOT JOIN THEN...OUR REASON FOR JOINING MORE
ON
> > SPREADING THE WORD FOR BETTER HEALTH RATHER THAN MAKING
COMMISION.WE
> > JUST WANTED TO HELP YOU SINCE YOU DID SAY YOU WANTED TO...BUT
OTHER
> > THAN THAT WE DIDNT REALLY CARE WHETHER YOU WERE OR NOT. WE ARE
JUST
> > HERE TO HELP PEOPLE.
>
> It's "on the side" until marks are so brainwashed it's their entire
> life. She's in, hook, line, and sinker. I'm sorry to hear that.
At
> this point, it's a waiting game and taking what chances you can to
ask
> questions. You know about logical fallacies now. If you want
more,
> look up the term in Wikipedia, since you know that site. Also look
for
> it in titles of previous posts. I wrote up a lot on it in one post
and
> someone else found a link that does a great job of explaining
them.
> The point is NOT to use them against her, but to let them help you
> frame questions that will push her to examine the facts. It's
possible
> when she can't answer questions she may start thinking about the
> situation.
>
> >
> >
> > THIS COMPANY IS MADE FROM PEOPLE THAT ARE WELL KNOW CHEMISTS AND
> > SCIENTISTS AND AWARD WINNING SCIENCE RESEARCHES...BASICALLY THEY
ARE
> > NOT JUST ORDINARY PEOPLE WHO WORK AT A LAB AND MADE THIS
DRINK....THE
> > OWNER OF THIS IS A TOP NUTRITIONISTS AND SCIENTISTS WHO NOW WORKS
> > FULL TIME WITH CHARITY AND GIVES ALL HIS EARNINGS FROM THIS TO
> > CHARITY...OBVIOUSLY YOU DIDNT RESEARCH ENOUGH SINCE YOU KNOW
NOTHING
> > ABOUT THIS COMPANY...
>
> And here's a kicker. I'll explain it in terms I know. I use Linux
> instead of Windows. Every six months or so there is a new study or
> report about how terrible Linux is and how great Microsoft is.
Then a
> few people check on the report and soon it turns out it's by a
> supposedly independent company that gets a lot of funding by
Microsoft.
>
> Anyone can get awards. They just have to start or work for a
company
> that will give them out. The trick is to check the awards and see
if
> they were awarded by a respect third party group.
>
> Another point is this is a fallacy: appeal to authority. "If this
> brainiac is working on it, it must be great!" That doesn't prove
it's
> great. It just proves one person thinks it is. True, their
> credentials count for something, but, again, check their
credentials.
>
> >
> >
> > IN AUGUST JERED AND UNCLE MIKE WILL BE FLYING TO VEGAS TO ATTEND A
> > CONVENTION IN VEGAS BECASUE THERE WILL BE A ZIJA STORE IN
VEGAS..WHY
> > HAVE DISTRIBUTORS THEN....WELL FOR BETTER COMMUNICATION AND FOR
> > PEOPLE WHO DONT LIVE IN VEGAS...EITHER WAY ITS THE SAME PRICE AND
> > WILL PROBABLY BE MORE EXPENSIVE AT THE STORE. LAST NIGHT THERE
WAS A
> > PHONE MEETING WITH THE GUY WHO ACTUALLY MADE THIS DRINK. IT WAS
> > NEAT....IT WAS NATIONWIDE SO PEOPLE FROM ALL OVER ASKED HIM
> > EVERYTHING...
>
> And I'll bet if she goes to Vegas to do this, she has to reserve
her
> room through the organization and pay for attending. They'll say
they
> don't make much through that event, but they'll probably clear
several
> million -- and that's after expenses.
>
> >
> >
> > WE KNOW THERE ARE MORINGA TREE BRANCHES AT SEAFOOD AND RANCH 99
AND
> > WEBSITES THAT SELL SEEDS TO PLANT. THIS COUNTRY IS TO FAST PACED.
IM
> > A BUSY MOM....EVERYONE WORKS....NOT EVERYONE HAS THE TIME TO
PLANT A
> > TREE AND MAKE THEIR OWN SALADS. WE CHOOSE THE DRINK BECAUSE FIRST
OF
> > ALL THE TREE BY ITSELF IS DISGUSTING. IT TASTES LIKE CRAP. NOT
> > EVERYONE WILL BE ABLE TO HANDLE THE TASTE. THE FORMULATOR
EXPLAINED
> > THATS WHY HE ADDED CANE SUGAR TO ADD FLAVOR AND TO HELP THE BODY
WITH
> > ABSORPTION TO ABSORB THE NUTRIENTS BETTER.
>
> I don't remember my chemistry (and yes, I taught Chemistry for a
year),
> but I'm not sure this is right. Anyone here know better? Or could
any
> moderators who know a doctor in the family run it by them? ;-)
>
> > HE HIMSELF REALLY VOMITED
> > BECAUSE THE FIRST THING HE DID WAS BLENDER IT PURE.IN AFRICA THEY
> > HAVE NO OPTION SO THEY HAVE TO JUST EAT THE LEAVES STRAIGHT. BUT
> > SINCE WE HAVE THIS OPTION WE CHOOSE THIS. WHY DRINK TAP WATER WHEN
> > THERE IS PURIFIED.
>
> I am trying to follow and understand just why she went off on this
> tangent and what it has to do with any of the rest. It sounds like
> programmed MLM speak and that she's just so used to it being part
of
> the spiel that she has to say it.

I think that is exactly what it is, programmed MLM speak, because I
did not ask her for any information at all. I didn't even ask her to
prove to me her "business" was legit. I just said look into it... I
also said that I would plant a tree in my backyard because it was
cheaper, and that I would eat it as a salad. (Just to piss her off
because at that point she was going on and on about how it had the
best "absorption." blah blah blah) That is why I asked those
questions in a previous post about believing in the product (the
mcguffin). I was almost suckered into believing in the main
ingredient. And I was going to be smart enough to get it cheaper!

>
> > AND THE WAY ZIJA IS MADE COMES FROM MORINGA TREES
> > WITHOUT THE PESTICIDES IN AN ENVIRONMENT UNDER A TENT BECAUSE THE
SUN
> > WILL KILL MOST OF THE NUTRIETNS.
>
> Again, I don't remember the science, but plants need sunlight to
grow.
> This sounds really odd. (I could be wrong.)
>
> > MY BEST FRIEND WORKS OUT AT LA
> > FITNESS HERE AND SHE INTRODUCED IT TO PEOPLE WORKING OUT AND THEY
> > SAID ITS "CONVENIENT".
>
> Oh, yes. That's an endorsement that means I need to just rush out
and
> buy it. Personally, after dealing with just a few people in
Hollyweird
> when I was pitching stories to TV, I tend to try to ignore trends
from
> that area.
>
> [confusing rambling cut out]...

That rambling was because I told her I would buy seeds from a grower
here in San Diego and plant it in my yard, and I would eat the leaves
in a salad, (purest form right, haha) and perhaps buy some moringa
powder so I can make my own drink. (Again, just to piss her off
cause she insisted Zija was the best way to consume it and get all
it's nutrients)

> > WE CAN GO ON AND ON BACK AND FORTH AND REALLY ITS A WASTE OF BOTH
OF
> > OUR TIMES. YOU SEEM LIKE YOUR ALWAYS CORRECT ABOUT THINGS AND
THAT WE
> > DONT KNOW MUCH AND YOU CANT ACCEPT THE FACT THAT EVEN IF YOU DIDNT
> > INTEND TO DO YOU THINK WE WOULD BE FEELING LIKE THIS TOWARDS YOU
NOW?
>
> Another sentence that's incredibly hard to follow, but yes, now the
ad
> hominem starts!

I think she really got pissed when I said I would buy a tree
instead. That is why she accused me of "always being correct."
(yes, I was being sarcastic to piss her off) But that was after I
politely said that there was a cheaper alternative that I thought she
would benefit from if she really BELIEVED in the product. Shit, she
got me believing in it!

>
>
> > IF YOU WANT TO RESPOND ITS OK YOU DONT HAVE TO BECAUSE WHATEVER
YOU
> > SAY I WILL SAY SOMETHING BACK ANYWAYS.NEXT TIME DONT ASK PEOPLE
HOW
> > THINGS ARE IF YOU PLAN ON JUST TRYING TO ACT LIKE YOU KNOW MORE
THAN
> > THE PEOPLE IN IT BY THINKING THEY ARE STUPID NOT KNOWING THERE ARE
> > SCAM AND ILLEGAL BUSINESSES OUT THERE....YOU MUST REMEBER YOU
EMAILED
> > US THAT AS PEOPLE ALREADY IN THE BUSINESS......AND PLEASE DONT
TELL
> > US TO THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONCERN....IF THATS CONCERN IN YOUR
> > WORLD...TO THE PEOPLE YOU TALK TO ITS MORE OFFENSIVE. I RESPECT
> > EVERYONE AND YOU KNOW THAT SO ME BEING THIS WAY NOW...THERES A
> > REASON.
>
> Ouch. You must have touched a really deep nerve. One way I put it
is
> that you can tell how on target you are with a bit of truth by how
> strongly someone fights against it. You must have hit a bullseye,
> judging by the strength of her anger in this letter.
>
> There is a lot wrong with this last paragraph, but I'm just a
little too
> worn out to even pick it apart. Nobody is saying the people are
> stupid. It's generally considered easier to con a smart person
than a
> dumb one!
>
> > Disgusting huh? This is why I am an MLM survivor. Thanks Hal, I
can
> > now spot all the MLM talk. :@)
>
> Wow! It's great to know I've done some good here, after all the
mess
> that comes up at times.
>
> Sorry for jumping in throughout but there were just so many logical
> fallacies that I could not resist using what your cousin wrote as
> examples.
>
> Hal
>

__._,_.___
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
SPONSORED LINKS
Free Blogging

Y! Web Hosting

Share your views

with the world.

Search Ads

Get new customers.

List your web site

in Yahoo! Search.

Yahoo! Groups

Take a Survey

express your ideas

share your opinion

.

__,_._,___

No comments: