On Wednesday 18 July 2007, xxfarmhandxx wrote:
> Um, no. Sorry Momluvs but I am one who researches EVERYTHING. I
> believe I annoy the "you Know what" out of most people for being
> a "know it all" so why not one more. Check out the following links"
>
> http://www.newton.
> http://www.guardian
I also had another link or two on this that I posted when the subject
first came up. If you are collecting them, search the archives
for "bee."
> And yes, Mr. Analytical here got TOTALLY sucked in by Scamway for
> about six years and many thousands of dollars. I didn't have my
> "lightbulb" moment for about five years after I got out. Thanks to
> Merchants of deception which led to this site. I STILL find myself
> sometimes wondering if it could work but then I shake my head and
> come here to read some posts. These MLM con artists are very good at
> what they do.
When my then-gf dragged me to an open meeting, I had already researched
Quackstar on the web and knew the issues. I think I had already seen
the Dateline article. Even with that background and recognizing their
fallacies (drat! I always want to type "phallacies" after a discussion
about misleading literary symbolism with a college professor), and
immediately catching some of their BS lines like, "We're not a pyramid
because THEY are," when all the people started lining up and going up
to the podium saying what they had made and how well they were doing, I
was tempted to sign up.
Hal
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment